Nudging: What Should Summative Assessment Look Like?
Wednesday, January 18th, 2012
You may have noticed that SLM is spending quite a bit of time on assessment lately, especially on the “Nudging” pages. With the twin reforms of accountability and, for most states, Common Core Standards, librarians are no longer exempt from measuring the impact of their learning.
The scenario below may be familiar to many librarians. How do librarians fit into the end-of-project ecosystem? What should they be assessing when they look at student work? In what balance?
Should students know in advance how they will be graded? Should rubrics and checklists be used to guide students into understanding teacher expectations, or does that backfire, accidentally setting minimum expectations? Should feedback be quantitative or qualitative? Measured in the project itself or reflected in students’ scores on standardized test questions regarding library skills or information literacy?
You may have noticed that SLM is spending quite a bit of time on assessment lately, especially on the “Nudging” pages. With the twin reforms of accountability and, for most states, Common Core Standards, librarians are no longer exempt from measuring the impact of their learning.
The scenario below may be familiar to many librarians. How do librarians fit into the end-of-project ecosystem? What should they be assessing when they look at student work? In what balance?
Should students know in advance how they will be graded? Should rubrics and checklists be used to guide students into understanding teacher expectations, or does that backfire, accidentally setting minimum expectations? Should feedback be quantitative or qualitative? Measured in the project itself or reflected in students’ scores on standardized test questions regarding library skills or information literacy?





