Archive for the ‘Students’ Category

Will Richardson’s Interview with Carol Dweck on Motivation & Praise

Monday, February 16th, 2009

This is a must-view video for all of us.  Dweck’s research probes the perils of empty praise and reinforces much of what the AASL Standards tell us about building students’ dispositions and self-assessment skills.  Don’t miss this or Dweck’s book, Mindset.

One of her key ideas is that we have a responsibility to help students develop a growth mindset (in which students believe that they are on a continuum of growth and can continue to build skills and expertise) instead of a fixed mindset (in which students believe their intelligent is pre-determined and cannot change, as in, “I’m smart, so I should know how to do this, and I can’t, so I’m frustrated” or, “I’m dumb, so that’s why I don’t get this - I give up.”)

Her work is so, so powerful, especially for those of us who work in upper middle-class environments in which there is some pressure to demonstrate “good parenting” or “supportive teaching” by praising — or over-praising — our students.

View it here.

Meme: What I want our students to be learning in 2009

Thursday, January 15th, 2009

Carl Harvey tagged me for a meme on what I want to be teaching in 2009.  I want to spin this a bit and talk about what I want my elementary students to be learning in 2009.  Here’s a start:

- I am continually working on shifting the focus from my teaching to student learning and from my library to our library.  

 

- I am hoping that my students will continue to deepen their interaction with information.  We’re still working on the delicate balance between developing the building blocks of research (”find answers to the questions on this list”) and inquiry.  Elementary kids do need some practice as they build the practical mini-skills that they’ll need for inquiry. The important thing is that we realize that those foundational skills are a means to an end, not an end.

 

- We’re playing with strategies to help our youngest learners engage in non-text-based inquiry.  We borrowed rocks from our Environmental Center and studied their attributes, and we launched the Fish Detectives who observe our school’s fish tank and compare their observations to the photos in our fish books.  Inquiry with objects with our pre-readers is working. 

- I’m working to help students see that their work comes with certain ownership/copyright privileges.  When our students see that their work “belongs” to them, it helps build a fundamental understanding of copyright.  I’m tickled beyond belief because our podcasting/videocasting students are starting to credit their influencers (teachers and fellow students), resources, and audio clips in their work.  WITHOUT US TELLING THEM TO DO IT Empowering them is so much more fun than nagging them to cite.  

 

- Our staff is on an ongoing journey to explore 21st-century learning themes: the ASCD Whole Child initiative, the Partnership for 21st Century Learning, the NETS*S, and the AASL Standards.  We’re starting to gain a common vocabulary and to realize that some of our deepest values as early childhood/elementary educators — play well with others, be fair, you are defined by not only what you accomplish but the kind of person that you are, etc. — are validated by these documents.  They remind us that we’re not starting from scratch and can build from where we are.  We are looking forward to a post-NCLB world and to a return to more holistic approaches to learning. 

 

- I’m continuing to work on being more explicit when I see students practicing the AASL Standards’ dispositions in action.  (I used to observe the dispositions and talk about them with teachers, but we didn’t necessarily bring the kids into that conversation.  Debbie Abilock got me thinking about being explicit with the learners.)  I’m trying to name the behaviors I’m seeing in hopes that students will see them in themselves.

 

- I’m trying to really think about conceptual understanding and how we support that in kids.  For example, a colleague in another building and I got into a really interesting conversation about how she teaches the concept of classification before she teaches the Dewey Decimal System.  Classification is a transferable concept – when students know that classification can be used by scientists just as it can be used by librarians, it packs a far bigger whallop than just teaching kids to memorize Dewey.  (Blech - boring.  I never memorized it until I was in my thirties, and I turned out OK.) 

 

- Many of the elementary media specialists in our district are working on developing centers in their libraries to encourage students’ independent explorations and creativity.  We’re populating our library spaces with magnetic letters and poetry, magnifying glasses, science observation areas, magnetized paper dolls, felt/flannel boards, checkerboards, writing centers, easels, white boards, math manipulatives, computer software, Web sites, and more.  We’re thinking about how students can “accidentally” develop writing, reading, drawing, problem-solving, and teamwork while we’re scrambling to check in their books or helping kids one-on-one.  We’re amazed at our students’ level of engagement and creativity.  And we have a bunch of kids who are writing about Sydney and how, when she puts three pigtails — trigtails — into her hair, she turns into a superhero.  Gotta love it.  We hardly ever have to say, “Stop playing Star Wars with the shelf markers” anymore.  We want our students to feel that the library is a place where they can engage in many ways - including and beyond books.

 

- We’re trying to empower students to use the library as their creative work space.  We opened up the schedule book this year and let kids directly book space in our production room and media center for their creative group work.  (Sometimes, I see “Katie” in the schedule book and think, “Who on our staff is named Katie?” Oh, Third Grade Katie booked it.) We’ve got some kinks to work out  (How did that library chair end up in our 48″ tall recycling bin — and why do we take perverse pride in that? Could someone please take the abandoned cafeteria food baskets back instead of just neatly stacking them up? And does anybody know where our tablecloths for lunchtime visitors went?), but it’s building more teacher-student camaraderie.  

 

- Weekly book talking with third and fourth graders has worked wonders in improving the variety and quality of what kids are checking out.  And we have a bunch of kids who now offer to book talk to their peers and host their own lunchtime book clubs.

 

- And we’re still working on some of the basics … Seriously, first graders, don’t think I don’t notice that you check out off-limits books when there’s a sub.  If you don’t want me to notice, don’t keep them until they’re overdue and Follett makes that nasty beep sound.  Return them on time, and I’ll never catch on to your little scheme.    

 

OK, your turn … what’s on your agenda?

Praising effort, not intelligence (Carol S. Dweck, Best of Educational Leadership)

Monday, October 27th, 2008

When we are working with students who are engaging in meaningful research, we want to praise their successful moments and support their struggles.  How often have we uttered words like, “That’s really smart thinking!” instead of rewarding their effort? According to Stanford professor Carol S. Dweck in “The Perils and Promises of Praise,” (Best of Educational Leadership 2007-2008) we do studnets a disservice when we praise intelligence over effort.  Gulp.  This is a must-read!  Here’s an excerpt: 

Praising students for their intelligence, then, hands them not motivation and resilience but a fixed mind-set with all its vulnerability. In contrast, effort or “process” praise (praise for engagement, perseverance, strategies, improvement, and the like) fosters hardy motivation. It tells students what they’ve done to be successful and what they need to do to be successful again in the future. Process praise sounds like this:

    • You really studied for your English test, and your improvement shows it. You read the material over several times, outlined it, and tested yourself on it. That really worked!
    • I like the way you tried all kinds of strategies on that math problem until you finally got it.
    • It was a long, hard assignment, but you stuck to it and got it done. You stayed at your desk, kept up your concentration, and kept working. That’s great!
    • I like that you took on that challenging project for your science class. It will take a lot of work—doing the research, designing the machine, buying the parts, and building it. You’re going to learn a lot of great things.

 


 

What about a student who gets an A without trying? I would say, “All right, that was too easy for you. Let’s do something more challenging that you can learn from.” We don’t want to make something done quickly and easily the basis for our admiration.

 

What about a student who works hard and doesn’t do well? I would say, “I liked the effort you put in. Let’s work together some more and figure out what you don’t understand.” Process praise keeps students focused, not on something called ability that they may or may not have and that magically creates success or failure, but on processes they can all engage in to learn. 

 

Food for thought as fall’s “research season” revs up.